Accurate as of: Jul 7, 2026
Mercy for Animals (MFA) is an organization that claims to have helped over a billion animals through corporate campaigns like the one below.

However, we believe that MFA's campaigns have actually helped close to zero animals.
On their website, MFA claims that their corporate campaigns have caused hundreds of corporations like Starbucks, Burger King, and Subway to implement meaningful animal welfare reforms.
At face value, these impact claims are impressive. However, these impact claims assume that MFA's campaigns actually caused corporations to meaningfully alter their behavior. And given that there are numerous reasons to believe this is not the case, we would expect the true impact of MFA's campaigns to be virtually zero.
MFA's impact claims are based on a favorable assumption. And that's the core problem.
By making favorable assumptions, any amount of impact can be claimed—even if the true impact is zero.
For this reason, we do not consider MFA's impact claims to be credible, and we do not recommend donating to them.
To receive updates when we publish new articles, subscribe to our newsletter below for free.
Animal Legal Defense Fund
Animal Legal Defense Fund uses the legal system to help animals. Recommended for donors who want to advance animal rights.
Shrimp Welfare Project (SWP)
SWP supplies tools that stun shrimp before they are slaughtered. Recommended for donors who want to reduce the suffering of invertebrates.
Fish Welfare Initiative
Fish Welfare Initiative works to improve water quality for farmed fish. Recommended for donors who want to improve animal welfare.
New Harvest
New Harvest supports the development of alternative protein products. Recommended for donors who want to stop factory farming.
Corporate Campaigns
Charities claim that corporate campaigns influence the decisions of multi-billion dollar companies. Economics suggests otherwise.
$1 to Save Billions of Lives? The Fantasy Math Behind Effective Altruism
Any metric can be calculated by using fantasy math, and that's what EA is built on.
A Bad Strategy Makes Everything Else Irrelevant
In our charity reviews, we oftentimes only address the strategy a charity is using, and do not address specific details about their operations. This is because if a charity's strategy is bad, then all other details about the charity are irrelevant.